St. Mackris v. O'Reilly et.al.
www.NewRuskinCollege.com
Lecture Notes: 10-25-04
Bad Credit
That is what Drudge splashed on Andrea Mackris. Bo Dietl had just said that he and his “investigators” were going to ruin her reputation, defame her, destroy her, undermine her credibility, and sure enough two days later Dredge had her credit report.
But here we can separate the amateur from the professional.
Do you think her credit report “improves” her case or “undermines” it?
Why did she take the calls? Why didn’t she just hang up the phone?
Remember? You have read these “points for the defense” being raised by the elite and the defenders of the elite. Paul Harvey for example.
She was his subordinate. He could have called almost any woman in the world. He chose this one. Why?
Because she was his subordinate. Because he knew she had a mountain of debt. (Two thirds of which were for student loans. But even this was presented as “high living” or “living beyond her means.” (Rose above her station did she?)) She needed the income. Needed the job in “his” organization. And what’s more he knew she needed the job. (Or does Fox not do credit checks on employees?)
And there is more. She had just returned from CNN, where she had been involved in another sexual harassment by employer situation. She was vulnerable and O’Reilly knew it.
Let us pause here and reflect on the “women of CNN.” Why did she have to deal with the harassment by the CNN superior? Or do you suppose the CNN management never sexually harassed any other female employee? Well, of course because the other “CNN women” did not stand up to the harassment. Were they so desperate for their jobs in the “media” that they would whore themselves out to management?
Or consider, why has no one at KGO-ABC come forward and given evidence about the burglary at the Colonial Motel. Rosie Allen? Want to guess? Because they too are desperate to keep their jobs. Bought and paid for. They are property of management. Corporate slaves.
So now geniuses, you tell me, (I only have 24 years experience in insurance litigation, what do I know?), but you are “J” School graduates, columnists, talk radio “personalities,” you tell me, does Ms. Mackris’ credit make her claim of duress more or less plausible?
Well of course, more plausible. Like so many others O’Reilly has confused his sex drive with his greed, his vanity, his desire for power. He admits he has “a big mouth,” by way of explanation. He derived special pleasure from not only the “phone sex,” but from the subordinate. She was the subordinate. She needed the job. He knew she had debts; and that he could force himself on his subordinate, this is what gave him the special pleasure he craved. He also knew she was involved in a prior sexual harassment situation at CNN. Would anyone believe her twice? After all she could just hang up the phone. Right? Isn’t that what you said? Genius? (Bo, this is satire, the humor lies in the fact that we all know you are a loud mouth coward, a fool. (That is why you helped Imus harasse me at GAB Robins. Because you are a coward.))
And speaking of cowards let us not forget the cowardly women at CNN and FOX. Or do you suppose that O’Reilly has not sexually harassed other subordinates at FOX?
And please remember all the cowards at KGO ABC who knew of Michael Weiner’s burglary at the Colonial Motel. And speaking of disturbed sexual deviants: remember too Michael Weiner following me to Berkeley, (see Psy Ops), and his following me to the health club and standing outside in the night, looking in windows from the darkness, (see Intel Operations), remember the electronic eaves dropping at the Colonial Motel, (see Psy Ops), and at the storage garage, (see Psy Ops); remember too Michael Weiner’s constant discussion of his homosexual desires, his love letters to Allen Ginsburg, (see Micael Savage Sucks . com); and as with O’Reilly, it was not just the sexual desire either, it was for Michael Weiner also the exercise of power --- the power to destroy another man’s life, that gave him his special pleasure.
text continues at www.NewRuskinCollege.com
Lecture Notes: 10-25-04
Bad Credit
That is what Drudge splashed on Andrea Mackris. Bo Dietl had just said that he and his “investigators” were going to ruin her reputation, defame her, destroy her, undermine her credibility, and sure enough two days later Dredge had her credit report.
But here we can separate the amateur from the professional.
Do you think her credit report “improves” her case or “undermines” it?
Why did she take the calls? Why didn’t she just hang up the phone?
Remember? You have read these “points for the defense” being raised by the elite and the defenders of the elite. Paul Harvey for example.
She was his subordinate. He could have called almost any woman in the world. He chose this one. Why?
Because she was his subordinate. Because he knew she had a mountain of debt. (Two thirds of which were for student loans. But even this was presented as “high living” or “living beyond her means.” (Rose above her station did she?)) She needed the income. Needed the job in “his” organization. And what’s more he knew she needed the job. (Or does Fox not do credit checks on employees?)
And there is more. She had just returned from CNN, where she had been involved in another sexual harassment by employer situation. She was vulnerable and O’Reilly knew it.
Let us pause here and reflect on the “women of CNN.” Why did she have to deal with the harassment by the CNN superior? Or do you suppose the CNN management never sexually harassed any other female employee? Well, of course because the other “CNN women” did not stand up to the harassment. Were they so desperate for their jobs in the “media” that they would whore themselves out to management?
Or consider, why has no one at KGO-ABC come forward and given evidence about the burglary at the Colonial Motel. Rosie Allen? Want to guess? Because they too are desperate to keep their jobs. Bought and paid for. They are property of management. Corporate slaves.
So now geniuses, you tell me, (I only have 24 years experience in insurance litigation, what do I know?), but you are “J” School graduates, columnists, talk radio “personalities,” you tell me, does Ms. Mackris’ credit make her claim of duress more or less plausible?
Well of course, more plausible. Like so many others O’Reilly has confused his sex drive with his greed, his vanity, his desire for power. He admits he has “a big mouth,” by way of explanation. He derived special pleasure from not only the “phone sex,” but from the subordinate. She was the subordinate. She needed the job. He knew she had debts; and that he could force himself on his subordinate, this is what gave him the special pleasure he craved. He also knew she was involved in a prior sexual harassment situation at CNN. Would anyone believe her twice? After all she could just hang up the phone. Right? Isn’t that what you said? Genius? (Bo, this is satire, the humor lies in the fact that we all know you are a loud mouth coward, a fool. (That is why you helped Imus harasse me at GAB Robins. Because you are a coward.))
And speaking of cowards let us not forget the cowardly women at CNN and FOX. Or do you suppose that O’Reilly has not sexually harassed other subordinates at FOX?
And please remember all the cowards at KGO ABC who knew of Michael Weiner’s burglary at the Colonial Motel. And speaking of disturbed sexual deviants: remember too Michael Weiner following me to Berkeley, (see Psy Ops), and his following me to the health club and standing outside in the night, looking in windows from the darkness, (see Intel Operations), remember the electronic eaves dropping at the Colonial Motel, (see Psy Ops), and at the storage garage, (see Psy Ops); remember too Michael Weiner’s constant discussion of his homosexual desires, his love letters to Allen Ginsburg, (see Micael Savage Sucks . com); and as with O’Reilly, it was not just the sexual desire either, it was for Michael Weiner also the exercise of power --- the power to destroy another man’s life, that gave him his special pleasure.
text continues at www.NewRuskinCollege.com
0 Comments:
Post a Comment
<< Home