Thursday, April 14, 2005

Imus v Frank at New Ruskin College

www.NewRuskinCollege.com

Date: 3-31-05

To: Robert Frank
Wall Street Journal
robert.frank@wsj.com

From: Plinio Designori
Magistor
New Ruskin College
PlinioDesignori@NewRuskinCollege.com

Re.: And it will never stop, I will destroy Robert Frank’s life . . . it will never stop. --- Don Imus


Now that you have started to learn the truth about Don Imus perhaps you can benefit from my experience.

I invite you to visit NewRuskinCollege.com to learn how Don Imus used his influence to destroy my life. In a few weeks I will commit suicide in protest of Don Imus and the others who have oppressed me for these last fourteen years. (Yes, fourteen years. When he says it will never stop he means that it will never stop. He will use his influence and power to destroy your life.) It will not stop.

Please understand that I too want to live. Even though I have been pushed to the very limits of society, oppressed, driven into poverty, still, in the morning, the sunrise is so beautiful my heart rejoices. As my time runs out the sun has been racing through the sky.

Life has resolved itself into a granular or cellular structure. My alienation is now so complete that I no longer live in a world of isolated individuals, but they themselves have devolved into isolated moments in time. People appear in a bewildering array of personalities minute by minute, seemingly talking gibberish and no one else seems to notice.

For example it started with me noticing intellectual inconsistencies. Tax shelters for the rich for example: The Gallo Brother’s Wine Institute or the Imus ranch. And of course Imus is so vain he does not see the larger issues. That anyone should question whether a wasted wizened old man and his young deranged wife should be allowed to shelter millions of dollars in an enterprise that would not exist except for our tax laws, never once occurs to him.

Why shouldn’t we allow a degenerate old druggy to decide how our tax dollars are spent? It is futile to point out that the money thus sheltered means that the rest of the people will now have to pay more. And who are they? The ones with the lowest ability to raise their prices; the highest “propensity to spend.” But in this idiocy Imus is in no way exceptional. (Senate Finance Chairman Charles E. Grassley (R-Iowa) said: “In exchange for these very generous tax breaks, charitable assets should be going to those in need. More and more, we're seeing that some people view charities and charitable gifts as a chance to help themselves, not others. What's going on isn't a pretty picture in the harsh light.” Acknowledging that “our enforcement presence faded in the late 1990s,” (Boy! Did it! How about completely sold out and corrupted by the very corporate entities the IRS and the Senate were supposed to be overseeing? Would you say that Mr. Grassley? ) and "weak governance practices.”)

Just recently “conservatives” who previously condemned “junk science” presented the obviously, and self admitted religiously biased, “doctors” culled from across the country, as representing “main stream scientific consensus” when they in fact knew that the consensus was just the opposite. It was an intellectual betrayal.

One minute they say one thing then in the next breath they contradict themselves . . . And you may be thinking ‘Well, come on, everyone has their limitations, different perspectives, how do you go from this to the complete disintegration of reason . . . the impossibility of communication . . . utter hopelessness?’

It is said that Ted Kaczynski was the subject of a psychological experiment when he was at Harvard. They wanted to find out what would happen to the subject if you deliberately denied everything. They found out. The survivors of the Soviet Prisons said that the worst of it was that they were housed with the lunatics, and diagnosed as being insane. After a while, they began to wonder . . .

But this is what I am trying to tell you, this is my warning, this is what happens to you when they start in on you. First you will think, “coincidence.” You will receive a letter from your sister, or a friend, someone you trust absolutely. And then Imus will repeat a phrase from the letter word for word. Coincidence. Then Michael Weiner will start reading from a notebook that you have left at home, or on a car seat, or in a motel room. Then you editor will hand back a story you have written and tell you to rewrite it. But then driving home, only an hour later, someone else on the radio will talk about having to “rewrite” and how editors do not know how to tell reporters when they are in trouble and about to be fired.

And right now you think: paranoia. Yes! Exactly! You will never know! Don’t you see? Once they start in on you, your wife? Can you trust your wife? Then what? A marriage counselor? Garrison Keillor? Rush Limbaugh? Your employer? Co-workers, for example? You go to lunch and when you get back to the office your brief case has been moved, opened? The secretary nods affirmatively to your co-worker’s questioning glance that you catch just out of the corner of your eye. They went through my briefcase? Then Imus reads something you emailed your editor.

Right now you might think that there are limits. You may work for a prestigious newspaper, or you are well to do, you think you have friends, or perhaps you simply think that you live in a nation where the ‘rule of law’ is respected. Is that what you think?

Or perhaps you are thinking that your colleagues, friends, family, or even just people generally, your fellow citizens, will not allow you to be targeted in this way. You may think, ‘This is America, there is justice.’ What you do not yet understand is that they will all join in. It will become a kind of game for them. This is what I meant about the granular structure of their personalities. They can not be trusted. They will betray you on questions of economics and medicine? If they will not accept an EEG or a CAT scan then how can you trust them on such trivial questions such as your oppression, the theft of your papers, etc. , etc.?

Right now you think you can trust them. There is Truth. Justice? You trust in good faith. Take this letter as a warning: One, it will not stop, Two, no one will help you.

Over the years many people have commented on my situation. They wanted me to know that they knew about Don Imus and Michael Weiner, Mrs. Jack Swanson, Ron Owens, Michael Krasney. Part of the game for them was that I should know that they knew. Do you see? They wanted me to know:

“I have heard what you do to some of your listeners.” --- Senator Hatch, on the Imus Show

“What are you going to do . . . hire an attorney? I’ve got the best attorneys in the country.” --- Don Imus

“Drop a card on someone.” --- Chris Matthews

“Let’s watch our metaphors.” --- Jim Leher

“I hope you are ‘adjusting’ to your new life of ‘white collar crime’.” --- John McLaughlin

“We better stop, I don’t want to get you into trouble.” --- Phillip Matier, S. F. Chronicle

“No talent . . . you are lint.’ --- Bill O’Reilly

“. . . so she can park her car in a red no parking zone.” --- unidentified Bay Area journalist.

“Like the man said, ‘The mass media is a hydra headed monster.’ --- fat balding reporter for the Sacramento Bee, on KQED

“Is Charles going to be around for a wile?” because “I want to call back and run a few things by Charles.” --- David Gregory on Imus, 04-13-04

“His mother . . . she died? . . .” --- Scott Bobro, Farmers Insurance

“taking baths.” --- Ron Owens

“witches” --- Jim Dunbar and Ed Wygant

“I love it when conservatives go after one another.”--- Bernie Ward

“Colonial Motel suspect . . .” --- The San Rafael Police, police radio

“Michael Krasney is on line three for you.” ---- AAA auto insurance

Barbara Simpson explained that she has no sympathy for people “who keep journals and diaries . . . writing everything down. And then it gets stolen and made public. So? And so? So? What do you expect?” --- Barbara Simpson

Last month Rush Limbaugh held up Mrs. Jack Swanson’s arm in a victory pose. (Mrs. Jack Swanson had tried to have Limbaugh fired from the Kansas City radio station they both worked at in the 1980’s. (She objected to his Femi-NAZIs. She was a liberal then. ))

Good luck.



Site Report for: www.newruskincollege.com
Date Range: 3/29/2005 to 3/29/2005

282. irs.gov


Counselor: What are they doing here?

Waiting for me to die. Not yet! Check back in a few weeks.

Counselor: Well, . . . maybe they are feeling remorse and are investigating themselves and will make amends for what they did?

. . . (You always need to keep it in your mind that she used to live in Marin County, California.) Yes, well possibly.

They may think that their Criminal Investigation Unit, headquartered in Atlanta, had developed too close a relationship with Crawford and Company, (world’s largest independent adjustment company), also headquartered in Atlanta, and that just because they developed more leads from the information illegally supplied by Crawford and Company, than I was able to help them develop, still, they should not have asked me to help with their investigation of Crawford and Company only to then give my name to Crawford and Company, and ruin my career in national and international claims settlements and investigation, and drive me into poverty and bankruptcy, and force me back to the Bay Area where my other enemies, Michael Weiner, Don Imus, Mrs. Jack Swanson, Ron Owens, Michael Kraseney could then use their influence to ----

Counselor: Yeah, yeah, we have heard all that before. (see the I R S and the Illegals From the North at the Moynihan) I was just wondering why they are still visiting?

Just waiting for me to die.

Counselor: Hmum. You know he wants his name spelled with two n’s?

Yeah.

Counselor: I thought so.


www.NewRuskinCollege.com

0 Comments:

Post a Comment

<< Home