The Dead at New Ruskin College
http://www.newruskincollege.com/
Lecture Notes: 05-18-05
Yes, Buchanan is right, his conservatism is dead. Schroupput! Good riddance. I spit on its corpse. I am glad to see it dead before me. What was it? He started out with Nixon and ended up advocating that we buy $9 a barrel oil from Saddam Husseins Kuwait. What was it? Not exactly a philosophy was it? He was, for example, a huge supporter of Reagan, yet the $8 trillion in National Debt is a mortgage on the future generations. Does he care? He is well off, what does he care? Indeed is this not how it is for you too? The Post Liberal elite is beyond, I mean to say you are beyond political philosophy. You have got yours so f--- the world. RIP Conservatism. (see Buchanan)
What was his conservatism that was not Pat Buchanan, and Pat Buchanans ego? Or take the 20 million illegals for another example of how conservatism means only putting ones head down in the hole a little less far than the liberal. National Review knows that amnesty again is going to happen and they have no alternative to suggest except enforcement of employer sanctions. No discussion of what political effects result from 20 million people being attrited would have on society. Not even any idea of keeping the problem from getting worse: No fence. Nothing so practical as a fence or consideration of how people actually live their lives with 20 million illegals. But what could you expect from prep school conservatives? (see National Review)
And what also could you expect if they can not even admit the true size of the problem, calling it 10 million despite the evidence to the contrary. (see Going Underground: America's Shadow Economy, bottom of the page, The IRS and the Illegals from the North) The conservatives do not want to make them legal. Yet consider that these same conservatives do not want to pay back the $8 trillion debt either. (They leave that for the children.) The Social Security system is looking at $12 trillion, the Medicare program is even larger. Oh, and then there are the pensions. (The left is no better, or actually worse if you can imagine. Al Franken would fix Social Security with the bonds in the filing cabinet in West Virginia. Randi Rhodes says that the insurance will pay the pensions in default.) But consider, the 20 million here illegally. Did they not accumulate the same way the debts have accumulated? Hiding from the truth. The Post Liberal elite is nothing if not accomplished liars. (see America's Shadow Economy at The IRS and the Illegals from the North )
We have about 45,000 miles of highway in the Eisenhower Interstate System. Have you never noticed that for most of those miles there are fences on both sides of the road? How is it that we have 90,000 miles of fences to protect our highways but can not spare a few thousand miles of fences to protect our borders? And can it be that I am the only person capable of making such an observation? Pat Buchanan, the editors of National Review never once glanced out their windows and noticed all that fencing? If you cn not control the border then what are we talking about? What was their conservatism but a different kind of lie to cover the same kind of egotism and self interest? (see Construct My Future)
* * * * * * *
Mr Blair said the end of deference and preference did not mean society did not have any rules.
To what extent did Weimar fail due to a failure of leadership?
Yes the collapse of Weimar was a failure of leadership. However, my definition of leadership is larger than just the politicians in Berlin. Tough I never contradict Doctor Professor Moynihan his ‘Who will be our Bruning?’ is not how I would have described it. (http://www.newruskincollege.com/id20.html ) Clearly the Communist Party leadership and the labor movement leadership failed Weimar. Their radicalism sought to heighten the contradictions. However, the final refutation eventually had to take place at Stalingrad. I would say the entire leadership group of Weimar, the teachers, businessmen, journalists, etc., and even ordinary citizens whose opinions have some influence on their fellows; in this since of leadership, the whole society, the culture, the social ethic, failed Weimar. The people of Weimar stopped working together, and were then vulnerable to predation, and taken out one at a time, by the NAZIs.
www.NewRuskinCollege.com
Lecture Notes: 05-18-05
Yes, Buchanan is right, his conservatism is dead. Schroupput! Good riddance. I spit on its corpse. I am glad to see it dead before me. What was it? He started out with Nixon and ended up advocating that we buy $9 a barrel oil from Saddam Husseins Kuwait. What was it? Not exactly a philosophy was it? He was, for example, a huge supporter of Reagan, yet the $8 trillion in National Debt is a mortgage on the future generations. Does he care? He is well off, what does he care? Indeed is this not how it is for you too? The Post Liberal elite is beyond, I mean to say you are beyond political philosophy. You have got yours so f--- the world. RIP Conservatism. (see Buchanan)
What was his conservatism that was not Pat Buchanan, and Pat Buchanans ego? Or take the 20 million illegals for another example of how conservatism means only putting ones head down in the hole a little less far than the liberal. National Review knows that amnesty again is going to happen and they have no alternative to suggest except enforcement of employer sanctions. No discussion of what political effects result from 20 million people being attrited would have on society. Not even any idea of keeping the problem from getting worse: No fence. Nothing so practical as a fence or consideration of how people actually live their lives with 20 million illegals. But what could you expect from prep school conservatives? (see National Review)
And what also could you expect if they can not even admit the true size of the problem, calling it 10 million despite the evidence to the contrary. (see Going Underground: America's Shadow Economy, bottom of the page, The IRS and the Illegals from the North) The conservatives do not want to make them legal. Yet consider that these same conservatives do not want to pay back the $8 trillion debt either. (They leave that for the children.) The Social Security system is looking at $12 trillion, the Medicare program is even larger. Oh, and then there are the pensions. (The left is no better, or actually worse if you can imagine. Al Franken would fix Social Security with the bonds in the filing cabinet in West Virginia. Randi Rhodes says that the insurance will pay the pensions in default.) But consider, the 20 million here illegally. Did they not accumulate the same way the debts have accumulated? Hiding from the truth. The Post Liberal elite is nothing if not accomplished liars. (see America's Shadow Economy at The IRS and the Illegals from the North )
We have about 45,000 miles of highway in the Eisenhower Interstate System. Have you never noticed that for most of those miles there are fences on both sides of the road? How is it that we have 90,000 miles of fences to protect our highways but can not spare a few thousand miles of fences to protect our borders? And can it be that I am the only person capable of making such an observation? Pat Buchanan, the editors of National Review never once glanced out their windows and noticed all that fencing? If you cn not control the border then what are we talking about? What was their conservatism but a different kind of lie to cover the same kind of egotism and self interest? (see Construct My Future)
* * * * * * *
Mr Blair said the end of deference and preference did not mean society did not have any rules.
To what extent did Weimar fail due to a failure of leadership?
Yes the collapse of Weimar was a failure of leadership. However, my definition of leadership is larger than just the politicians in Berlin. Tough I never contradict Doctor Professor Moynihan his ‘Who will be our Bruning?’ is not how I would have described it. (http://www.newruskincollege.com/id20.html ) Clearly the Communist Party leadership and the labor movement leadership failed Weimar. Their radicalism sought to heighten the contradictions. However, the final refutation eventually had to take place at Stalingrad. I would say the entire leadership group of Weimar, the teachers, businessmen, journalists, etc., and even ordinary citizens whose opinions have some influence on their fellows; in this since of leadership, the whole society, the culture, the social ethic, failed Weimar. The people of Weimar stopped working together, and were then vulnerable to predation, and taken out one at a time, by the NAZIs.
www.NewRuskinCollege.com
0 Comments:
Post a Comment
<< Home