Surprise? at New Ruskin College
www.NewRuskinCollege.com
Lecture Notes: 07-14-05
Psychological Manipulation
Surprised? The Prime Minister is surprised?
Surprised that a group of people can manipulate the psychology of a target to cause him to kill himself? Or is it only because they can manipulate him to kill others along with himself which causes the surprise?
How can the British Prime Minister be surprised? It has been in all the newspapers. Doesn’t he read the newspapers? Stories about cults. Stories about cons. Stories about government agencies which carry out programs of deception. (Britain and the USA were themselves targets of Iraq’s deception campaign about its own support for terrorism.)
The British Prime Minister could probably tell us a story or two.
Every time one of hate radio’s gas bags releases steam about “Muslims”, speaking about Islam as if it were a hierarchical religion, as if it were similar to Catholicism, what are they doing but attempting to manipulate their targets otherwise known as the audience?
For of course Islam is more like Judaism than Catholicism. Each Imam, like a rabbi, is free to interpret, teach, preach as he likes. There are branches of thought, even schools, but no central hierarchy as with Catholicism.
But if you wanted to create hatred you would not report that this Imam said this, and that Imam did something else, no, you would say only that Islam preaches hate, and Islam manipulates the psychology of its adherents to murder etc. etc. For example, when the Peoples Temple group ended in murder and suicide you did not hear the condemnation of Christianity even though they espoused Christianity and used Christianity as a justification and explanation of their murders.
Indeed even after the Hutus, Catholics, murdered a million Tutsi victims, Protestants, and even now after many Catholic priests have been convicted of genocide, and incitement to genocide, even now, the “religious” aspect is not reported, the Catholics and Protestants are not identified, let alone using their religions as a way of explaining the genocide. Christianity is blameless while daily Imus, Weiner, O’Reilly, and locally Rodgers identify Islam as being responsible for every murder. The most obscure Imams are cited as if they were definitive sources while the sermons of the Catholic priests of Rwanda are never even mentioned.
And again at Waco Texas and the so called Branch Davidians, nothing about the murderous Christians and Christian extremists.
I recall that both my sister and Yvonne (another connection? Or coincidence, or cosmic consciousness?) quoted the Bhagwan Shree Rajneesh whose group carried out the first bio-attack in the United States. Though cults were fingered in that attack Hinduism was not singled out as a cause. Ironically the local media did refer to the Aum Shinri Kyo cult as a “Buddhist cult” but later “Buddhist” was mysteriously dropped as an identifier. (There are a lot of powerful Buddhist in the Bay Area. It pays to have influential friends.)
Regular College Visitors have themselves seen how I was the target of a wide ranging conspiracy of fanatics who sought to manipulate my psychology. (See Psy Ops and Intel Operations)
The difference is that when employees of KQED used their influence with the counselor Yvonne to betray her client they did not have a very well worked out scheme.
The radical Imams on the other hand do. They know exactly what they want, and how to achieve it. They do not always succeed. Israel has a whole cell block of a prison filled with suicide bombers whose psychological programming was not perfected in their death.
In my case there was a great deal of randomness. Indeed this is why it is so difficult to know all that was done to me. Mrs. Jack Swanson had no clear aim other than to inflict suffering. Don Imus had no program beyond simply “fucking with your head.” Michael Weiner thought he was, lost in his hallucinations, defending the Jewish race.
But the network of radical Imams, (Robert Baer talks in his books not about al Qaeda so much as the Islamic Brotherhood, most of whom thought OBL was a showboater a PR man not a serious terrorist), do not waste their time as have my oppressors.
They identify vulnerable people, (mostly young men), manipulate them to become more vulnerable, religion here is a powerful tool, but not the only one, offer them a means of resolving their conflict, then strap on the bomb and done.
One, two, three . . . no wasted effort preening on the radio the way Ron Owens does, know hysterical attempts at self justification the way Michael Weiner does.
Yes, regular College Visitors can readily see how a network of rich powerful people can select a target, psychologically manipulate him to his suicidal death. We have been studying this for a number of years now.
We are not surprised.
Nor are we surprised that others cover up the truth. We are not surprised that many do not come forward and give evidence. Not surprised to hear others offer excuses. No. We are not surprised.
www.NewRuskinCollege.com
Lecture Notes: 07-14-05
Psychological Manipulation
Surprised? The Prime Minister is surprised?
Surprised that a group of people can manipulate the psychology of a target to cause him to kill himself? Or is it only because they can manipulate him to kill others along with himself which causes the surprise?
How can the British Prime Minister be surprised? It has been in all the newspapers. Doesn’t he read the newspapers? Stories about cults. Stories about cons. Stories about government agencies which carry out programs of deception. (Britain and the USA were themselves targets of Iraq’s deception campaign about its own support for terrorism.)
The British Prime Minister could probably tell us a story or two.
Every time one of hate radio’s gas bags releases steam about “Muslims”, speaking about Islam as if it were a hierarchical religion, as if it were similar to Catholicism, what are they doing but attempting to manipulate their targets otherwise known as the audience?
For of course Islam is more like Judaism than Catholicism. Each Imam, like a rabbi, is free to interpret, teach, preach as he likes. There are branches of thought, even schools, but no central hierarchy as with Catholicism.
But if you wanted to create hatred you would not report that this Imam said this, and that Imam did something else, no, you would say only that Islam preaches hate, and Islam manipulates the psychology of its adherents to murder etc. etc. For example, when the Peoples Temple group ended in murder and suicide you did not hear the condemnation of Christianity even though they espoused Christianity and used Christianity as a justification and explanation of their murders.
Indeed even after the Hutus, Catholics, murdered a million Tutsi victims, Protestants, and even now after many Catholic priests have been convicted of genocide, and incitement to genocide, even now, the “religious” aspect is not reported, the Catholics and Protestants are not identified, let alone using their religions as a way of explaining the genocide. Christianity is blameless while daily Imus, Weiner, O’Reilly, and locally Rodgers identify Islam as being responsible for every murder. The most obscure Imams are cited as if they were definitive sources while the sermons of the Catholic priests of Rwanda are never even mentioned.
And again at Waco Texas and the so called Branch Davidians, nothing about the murderous Christians and Christian extremists.
I recall that both my sister and Yvonne (another connection? Or coincidence, or cosmic consciousness?) quoted the Bhagwan Shree Rajneesh whose group carried out the first bio-attack in the United States. Though cults were fingered in that attack Hinduism was not singled out as a cause. Ironically the local media did refer to the Aum Shinri Kyo cult as a “Buddhist cult” but later “Buddhist” was mysteriously dropped as an identifier. (There are a lot of powerful Buddhist in the Bay Area. It pays to have influential friends.)
Regular College Visitors have themselves seen how I was the target of a wide ranging conspiracy of fanatics who sought to manipulate my psychology. (See Psy Ops and Intel Operations)
The difference is that when employees of KQED used their influence with the counselor Yvonne to betray her client they did not have a very well worked out scheme.
The radical Imams on the other hand do. They know exactly what they want, and how to achieve it. They do not always succeed. Israel has a whole cell block of a prison filled with suicide bombers whose psychological programming was not perfected in their death.
In my case there was a great deal of randomness. Indeed this is why it is so difficult to know all that was done to me. Mrs. Jack Swanson had no clear aim other than to inflict suffering. Don Imus had no program beyond simply “fucking with your head.” Michael Weiner thought he was, lost in his hallucinations, defending the Jewish race.
But the network of radical Imams, (Robert Baer talks in his books not about al Qaeda so much as the Islamic Brotherhood, most of whom thought OBL was a showboater a PR man not a serious terrorist), do not waste their time as have my oppressors.
They identify vulnerable people, (mostly young men), manipulate them to become more vulnerable, religion here is a powerful tool, but not the only one, offer them a means of resolving their conflict, then strap on the bomb and done.
One, two, three . . . no wasted effort preening on the radio the way Ron Owens does, know hysterical attempts at self justification the way Michael Weiner does.
Yes, regular College Visitors can readily see how a network of rich powerful people can select a target, psychologically manipulate him to his suicidal death. We have been studying this for a number of years now.
We are not surprised.
Nor are we surprised that others cover up the truth. We are not surprised that many do not come forward and give evidence. Not surprised to hear others offer excuses. No. We are not surprised.
www.NewRuskinCollege.com
0 Comments:
Post a Comment
<< Home